Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Spuzz Date: Aug 30, 2004 9:30am
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: The quality of discussion

I might as well mention this here...

The key words here are 'watch films' before writing reviews, because I have increasingly noticed that Cashel's reviews for a film came from screenshots, and not watching the whole film, for example, his review of 'Sailing Along'

If you read the review, then look at the screenshots, you'll realize my point.

Sorry if I am appearing nitpicky, but reviewing films like this is like a professional critic reviewing films based on the press kit.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Lewis Payne Date: Aug 30, 2004 10:55am
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: The quality of discussion

I HATE the idea of people posting reviews of any kind without seeing the film first. I hope he does not make a habit of this.